--Appellate Court, 4 judge panel w/ 140 years combined legal experience,
slyly made a finding that the Brooklyn Lyceum moved too late
because the Lyceum's motion, A (served/entered/argued on Oct 17/19/22),
came AFTER the ENTRY of Judgment of Foreclosure, B (entered Oct 26)
without ever citing the entry dates of the motion and the Judgment
(whose entry date does not exist anywhere in the record on appeal).
This is utter horseshit because the standard in New York
ALWAYS starts and ends with NOTICE OF ENTRY, not just ENTRY.
Also horseshit because:
the motion (A) is datetime
stamped AFTER the Judgment (B), not before.
By making a finding premised on a bullshit standard
and factually incorrect even with the bullshit standard,
you have to wonder, who wrote this decision, why,
and why it took four months to come up with
the bullshit finding?
-- Same court, same ruling, found, with no proof cited,
that Plaintiff timely moved the 1st motion in case,
despite the Lyceum raising the failure to serve Lyceum attorney
at oral argument on appeal before the 4 judges,
again without citing the dates of any actions or documents.
Bullshit finding that a motion never served on Lyceum attorney
is timely, or even done at all.